Is City’s ‘chew them up and spit them out’ mentality sustainable?

Waking up on Tuesday morning the first football orientated news story that caught my gaze was that Manchester City were prepared to ‘offload’ striker Edin Dzeko in the summer. Slowly bestirring oneself from an eight-hour slumber the neurones whizzing around in my recently reanimated brain laboured hard to put together a feasible motive as to why a club would want to let a front man, with 18-goals to his name this season, leave. Using the term ‘offload’ makes it sound as if City are desperate to dispose of the Bosnian. More than likely  it was his crimes against goalscoring that broke the camels back. In truth Dzeko has fluttered in and out form  this season, failing to nail down a regular starting spot ahead of popular pair Sergio Aguero and Mario Balotelli. Even the nefarious Carlos Tevez has wormed his way back into the fold and now appears to be Roberto Mancini’s new sidekick as they chase a first Premier League title in City history.

However there is a deeper narrative to the news that Dzeko is will shortly be clearing out his locker at the Etihad Stadium and waving goodbye to the blue half of Manchester once the season reaches it’s climax. City’s frantic need to bring home a league title has seen them burn holes through many a chequebook over the last two or three seasons with players joining and leaving before they’ve even had time to unpack their suitcase. Dzeko cost them £27 million just over 18-months ago but the chances of recouping half of that amount appear to be slim. It’s a growing and unsustainable trend that could threaten City’s hopes of ever achieving their championship goal and making an impact in European competition. It could plunge them firmly in the red with the new Financial Fair Play rulings looming over the horizon.

I’ll try to avoid delving into the whole ‘Man City trying to buy the title is so unfair’ but in reality it actually is with it having a negative effect on other clubs around Europe. With a billionaire Sheik subsidising Mancini and predecessor Mark Hughes’ lavish thirst for expensive players they are constantly driving up the cost of transfer fee’s and wages forcing clubs to spend beyond their means in order to compete. City’s unlimited spending power puts their rivals under pressure to match up or settle for second best. With the new financial regulations coming into force next year clubs will only be permitted to record debt of upto £37.5 million over a two year period with the focus on eventually breaking even and operating within their profits in time for the 2014/15 campaign.

[ad_pod id=’unruly-2′ align=’left’]

But, with City’s penchant for spending colossal amounts of money in the transfer window their chances of complying with the new laws are slim. Their decision to dump Dzeko, inevitably incurring a massive loss on what they paid for him, is the latest in a long line of players that have been purchased at over inflated rates and sold at a deficit. Perhaps the worst examples of the clubs careless spending are strikers Emmanuel Adebayor, Jo, Robinho and Roque Santa Cruz who were purchased at a combined cost of £100 million. Jo eventually left on a free after scoring once in 21 league appearances following his £17.5 million move from CSKA Moscow. Santa Cruz joined for a similar amount from Blackburn in 2009 but went on to play 20 games finding the net just three times and hasn’t worn a City shirt for almost two years. Adebayor fared slightly better following his £25 million move from Arsenal with 19 goals in 45 appearances but his petulant behaviour towards Mancini saw him loaned out to Tottenham this season with a cut price summer move to White Hart Lane on the cards. Robinho joined Hughes’ revolution just after the Abu Dhabi group took control of City costing a hefty £32.5 million. He departed to AC Milan within two-years for half of what the club paid for him. Even big money buys like Gareth Barry, Joleon Lescott, James Milner and Kolo Toure won’t command half of the fee’s they were purchased for.

Add into that a hefty weight bill and substantial player bonuses and it starts to paint a picture as to why their negligent transfer strategy could potentially hinder the chances of glory in the future. With UEFA cracking down on clubs frittering away capital that they don’t possess City could face expulsion from the Champions League if their finances fail to abide by the new directives. Buying players and then discarding them once they fall out of favour or become alienated operates beyond the realms of prudence. It will never be sustainable in modern football environment that is entering a economic transition. In all honesty it’s absurd. No doubt costly acquisitions in the mould of Adebayor and Santa Cruz will make their way to the blue half of Manchester at the seasons conclusion and ultimately end up on the City scrapheap. The decision to get rid of Dzeko in the summer bears all the hallmarks of City’s ‘buy now ask questions later’ transfer blueprint.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Thus the summer of lunacy has begun.

[divider]

City and United in transfer battle for Bilbao ace

Manchester City and Manchester United are set to battle it out this summer to sign Athletic Bilbao’s highly-rated midfielder Ander Herrera, according to The Sun.

The 22-year-old box-to-box man has been labelled ‘the Spanish Steven Gerrard’ and has impressed in the Basque club’s stellar La Liga campaign and progression to the Europa League semi-finals.

City are believed to have sent chief scout Rob Newman and football officer Brian Marwood to watch Herrera during Bilbao’s draw at Granada on Wednesday.

United meanwhile have had first-hand experience of playing against Herrera this term, with Marcelo Bielsa’s side knocking the Red Devils out of the Europa League.

The midfielder still has four years left on his contract at San Mames, but a transfer fee of around £16 million is being touted for the English sides to potentially land their man.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

By Gareth McKnight

[ad_pod id=’unruly-2′ align=’left’]

Why are we as a nation so resistant to change?

With Euro 2012 rapidly approaching, England fans are hoping to avoid another scathing post-mortem come the end of the summer: why are we not as technically good as Holland? Why can’t we beat the Germans? Why can’t we pass it like Spain? The very same questions appear year after year, tournament after tournament.

As a footballing nation, England prides itself upon its colossal tradition and the gratification of being football’s founding institution. Yet for all the legends and myths attached to the English psyche, as a collective footballing entity England is in danger of slipping into the realms of mediocrity, as failure to evolve in the same manner as our contemporaries leaves English football susceptible to deterioration.

For some time now, nations in Europe and beyond have been developing new systems, innovative training regimes and unique tactical philosophies which though not entirely revolutionising the game, have notably reshaped and reinvigorated the way in which we think about football. On the other hand, England in contemporary times have brought Kevin Davies and Michael Ricketts into the international fold.

As well as the national team struggling to adapt to modern football’s progressive ways, our club sides have also thrown a stubborn fist in the face of transformation. Despite the rapid spread of globalized forces into the English game, domestic clubs still remain largely antiquated institutions as traditional hierarchical structures persist. There is an owner; he owns. There is a manager; he manages.

Only on very rare occasions has this arrangement been compromised, with generally blundering consequences. A list of various Directors of Football at English clubs reads like a Crimewatch episode for those wanted for crimes against the customary norms of English football. Damien Comolli at Spurs and Liverpool, Avram Grant’s ill-fated time in the job at Chelsea and Sir Clive Woodward’s groundbreaking appointment at Southampton all ended in prevailing misery for those involved. The idea of a manager having anything less that total control over his playing squad is an alien one to English football – time to change?

One Englishman leading the charge for greater evolvement is Lee Congerton at Hamburg in the Bundesliga. Formerly Chief Scout at Chelsea, Congerton moved with Frank Arnesen to the German club last summer and has excelled in his new role as Technical Director. In a recent interview with the Guardian, Congerton outlines his desires for the role to be more widely recognised in England: “I would love to see this role grow in England because I think it can offer so much to clubs. Here in Germany every club has it and it’s very much about the medium to long-term development. And that’s maybe a problem with the English game – the coach goes, big pay out and off we go again.”

Congerton’s words strike a resonating chord in regards to the psychological oversight which is adversely affecting football in England. The English disposition does not allow for this kind of progressive, enterprising form of football governance. The manager is in charge and he must get it right; if he does not, simply sack him and get another in. It’s a cyclical disaster and one which much change if English football on whole wants to achieve growth and betterment.

The introduction of such a role for English club would no doubt aid the development of the academies, as well as laying the foundations for a more expansive way of thinking in the English game. Young players find exceeding benefit with the presence of similar positions at German clubs – outlined by the striking rise in prominence of Mesut Ozil, Sami Khedira and Thomas Muller. Germany are widely insisted to be great favourites for Euro 2012 playing a enviously attractive brand of football, and with club and international football inextricably linked, this has been aided to no end by the developmental structure of the German game.

Why can’t the English do this? Because we’re too resistant to change. Too stubborn, too proud. Congerton states that his “dream in years to come would be to help a manager be successful at a big Premier League club and put some footprints in the sand for the role to grow for others.” Unless the English attitude alters significantly in order to accommodate this change, we may find ourselves languishing further behind our counterparts for many years to come.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Can you explain why we as a nation cannot find it within ourselves to accept change? Tweet me @acherrie1

[ad_pod id=’unruly-2′ align=’left’]

The transfer dilemma facing Kenny Dalglish

Liverpool’s exploits in front of goal this season have been much criticised, and understandably so, with Kenny Dalglish’s men struggling on a weekly basis to covert chances into goals. As we all know goals-win-games, and as a result of their failings, the Reds have dropped points at home to the likes of Swansea, Norwich and Wigan, denting their early season ambitions for a spot in the top four.

Despite boasting a strike-line with a combined value of almost £60 million, chances have gone unconverted all season, leaving the Mersey men with a goal tally of just 43 after 36 games. To put this into perspective 19th placed Blackburn Rovers have netted on 47 occasions, whilst table topping Manchester City have managed over double the Reds tally, with 88. This consistent failure to turn chances into goals has led to calls from fans and pundits alike for Kenny Dalglish to enter the transfer market and secure a new centre forward for next season. Liverpool fan group Empire of the Kop (@empireofthekop) believe that the club need a lethal finisher to move up to the next level:

“We are lacking in the final third of the pitch. We haven’t created enough shots on target and have hit the woodwork more than 30 times. We need some one who can simply ‘pop the ball in the net’, someone who can just finish.”

Whilst this sentiment remains true, Liverpool arguably possess such a player already in Luis Suarez. The Uruguayan has been a real hit since his arrival on Merseyside in January 2010, instantly winning over the fans with his all action displays and breath-taking ability on the ball. Suarez made an instant impact at Anfield, netting on his debut during the club’s 2-0 home victory over Stoke City, before going on to notch a further three goals as Liverpool surged from 12th place to a sixth, narrowly missing out on Europa League football.

However, this season has been far more difficult for the striker, who has had to contend with off-field issues, and a failing Reds unit. Despite this he has taken his tally to 11 in the league, as well as producing some important strikes in the club’s domestic cup successes, including the cooly finished equaliser in the FA Cup semi-final against Everton.

[ad_pod id=’unruly-2′ align=’left’]

Despite this the Uruguayan’s finishing has been called into question during his first full season in the Premier League, with many believing the striker is not the answer to the club troubles in front of goal. However, last weekend’s hat-trick against Norwich displayed Suarez’s full range of ability in front of goal, as the 25-year-old produced three stunning finishes, including a wonderful 45-yard chip over John Ruddy.

The majority of his efforts this season have failed to find the back of the net, but when you consider the quality of service he has been receiving it’s little wonder. Andy Carroll is showing signs of improvement, but for the majority of the campaign he has been poor, whilst Stewart Downing, Charlie Adam and Jordan Henderson have all disappointed throughout the season. Steven Gerrard’s return has clearly aided the club’s front-line, yet due to injury problems in the squad, the skipper has been deployed in a deeper role, and as a result has been unable to link up with Suarez. Due to these factors, the number seven has had to create openings for himself, which is undoubtedly a difficult job. Although his technique and low centre of gravity allow him to beat his marker frequently, the chances of both making the opening and finding the net are fairly slim.

As his goal record of 81 in 110 for former club Ajax displays, Suarez is extremely able in front of goal, hinting that if he receives the right kind of service, he more often than not, will finish the job. As a result Liverpool may benefit from adding more creativity this summer, in a bid to get the best out of their talented South American. The club have already been linked with his fellow countryman Gaston Ramirez as well as AZ Alkmaar midfielder Rasmus Elm, both of whom are potent in terms of creating chances, hinting at a desire on the part of the Anfield club to aid their struggling front-men.

It’s likely that Liverpool will enter the market for a vast array of players this term, as the Fenway Sports Group look to fund an improvement in the squad. The club need to alter their fortunes in front of goal for next season, but the answer to the issues may be closer to home than they realise.

Is Luis Suarez the answer for Liverpool? Or do they need a top level finisher to compete? Let me know your thoughs by commenting or follow @Alex_Hams on Twitter

Special thanks to @empireofthekop (www.empireofthekop.com/anfield/)

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

[divider]

How Important Is The League Cup For A Club Like Ipswich?

The draw for the League Cup was held last week to decide every league club’s starting fixture.

Ipswich haven’t ever had much luck in the competition and in recent years they have used the cup as a chance to give reserve players some game time.

A lot of other sides have chosen to do the same and as a consequence the credibility of the League Cup has been in decline since it was founded over 50 years ago.

The prize money for winning the league cup is only £100,000 which is significantly smaller than the £2 million prize given to the FA Cup winners. The other incentive for winning the League Cup is Europa League qualification but neither that nor the cash prize is enough to make it worth the time of a top 4/5 clubs.

However, for a Championship club like Ipswich, Europa League qualification would be a massive prize. The only question Ipswich would need to ask is whether it is worth risking the teams fitness levels for a shot at the cup?

It is safe to say that most Premier League clubs won’t be too bothered about the cup this year and they will probably use a lot of reserve or youth players in the earlier rounds. This could well give a Championship side a good chance to steal the trophy and cause an upset. After all, Cardiff managed to get all the way to the final last season and a few other Championship sides have got far in the competition recently.

Club’s like Ipswich will be weighing up their chances and deciding whether it is worth potentially tiring out a few first team players for a shot at the League Cup trophy. Cardiff certainly suffered last season because of their run in the competition. They invested a lot of energy into the cup by fielding their strongest team every game which could have cost them promotion.

The only consolation prize for Cardiff was the £50,000 runners up prize which is pretty insignificant even for a Championship side. In hindsight Cardiff’s cup run probably wasn’t worth it as the extra games hindered their chances of succeeding in the play-offs or even pushing for automatic promotion.

When Roy Keane was in charge of Ipswich he made it clear that he did not care for the League Cup as he played mostly youth and reserve players. Although Keane made a lot of mistakes at Portman Road this wasn’t one of them. Any team hoping to gain a play-off place should refrain from using first team players in the League Cup because the potential risk of damaging league form isn’t worth it.

Personally, the only sides I can see the newly named Capital One Cup appealing to are Premier League clubs that know they have no chance of qualifying for Europe via their league position and know they have no chance of being relegated, sop very few.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

It could possibly appeal to Championship sides who have no chance of going up or down but the division is always so open that this rarely happens. There isn’t much appeal for League One and League Two teams either as they don’t have the strength in depth to stand a chance of winning the cup, even against weaker higher level clubs.

In conclusion, for Ipswich I don’t think the League Cup is good for anything apart from maybe giving some youth and reserve players some game time. Looking on a much bigger scale I don’t think the cup is good for anyone apart from a few Premier League teams. In total 92 clubs enter and it is only good for 4 or 5 of those clubs. I think we should consider scrapping the cup altogether.

[ad_pod id=’writer-1′ align=’right’]

Tottenham ace set for Bundesliga return

Tottenham midfielder Rafael Van Der Vaart may re-join former club Hamburg, as he could find himself surplus to requirements at White Hart Lane under new boss Andre Villas-Boas, reports The Guardian.

The 29 year old enjoyed a rich vein of form in the Spurs starting eleven under Harry Redknapp, but with his position less assured under Villas-Boas, he could move back to Hamburg, where he played for three years prior to joining Real Madrid in 2008.

Having been initially linked to a move to Schalke 04, Club CEO Clemens Tonnies recently bought an end to any speculation, leaving Hamburg the front runners to sign the Dutchman.

The arrival of Gylfi Sigurdsson from Hoffenheim last week also doesn’t favour Van Der Vaart, who could leave alongside Luka Modric, subject to a bid from Real Madrid.

The move could suit Van Der Vaart however, as not only will he be guaranteed more first team football, he also enjoys cult status among the Hamburg faithful. It will also suit his wife, a German television presenter who regularly finds herself travelling between Germany and London.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Tottenham could find themselves in different shape ahead of the new season under their new boss.

[ad_pod id=’dfp-mpu’ align=’right’]

A bitter pill worth swallowing for Liverpool?

Denial can be a difficult thing in football. The admittance of error is something we seldom hear in the Premier League and in an industry where mistakes often cost millions, perhaps it’s easier to skew our opinions and beliefs into believing what we’re witnessing is right.

There is always a nature of blind faith supporting any football club and Liverpool fans aren’t any different from any others in the league. Although there has to be a cut off point. A backdrop of cultural and ethical implications may have shrouded the support of Luis Suarez, but there are no blurred lines in the support of Andy Carroll’s place in the team.

If Brendan Rodgers wants him out, then that is the only stance supporters should be buying into – that of footballing principles. Because at the end of the day, transfer fees, bruised pride and idyllists aren’t going to win you football games. The vision of the manager and the way his players perform in his set-up, will. Nothing else should matter.

The Andy Carroll situation has fast turned into something of a burning dilemma up at Anfield. It’s been quipped a million times, but it wasn’t the Gateshead born striker’s fault he cost £35 million. He wasn’t worth that much and probably never will be. Although the fact is that it has played its part in his difficult last 18 months at Liverpool.

But there is also a fact that you don’t become a bad player overnight. Form is temporary; class is permanent, so they say. Some may be ready to ridicule such a statement, but his time at Liverpool doesn’t mean that he can’t still become a massive Premier League success.

Carroll showed enough at Newcastle to suggest this and towards the closing stages of last season at Liverpool as well. His overwhelming gift is of course an immense aerial prowess, but he has a decent ability to hold the ball up too and a sincerely powerful shot as well. What he needs is a team that is willing to base their entire side around him. Play to his strengths and there are rewards to be reaped. It might not be tiki-taka football, but what does it matter?

There is more than one way to play football and just because Carroll epitomises the strengths of a less favourable style in today’s game, it doesn’t mean that a Premier League team can’t be successful with him in their side.

[ad_pod id=’dfp-mpu’ align=’right’]

But that also decrees that Carroll’s game isn’t going to be suited to all set-ups. And the question has to be, does Brendan Rodgers have a need for an archetypal English number nine in his new Liverpool set-up? In the fluid, mobile system Rodgers will look to play, the emphasis is going to be all around possession; pass, pass and pass again. The ball is going to be kept on the deck, as opposed to launched into the air. His frontman is going to need to bestow intelligent movement and technically excellent hold up play. You can see where this is going.

You can’t force the shoe on if it doesn’t fit. If Brendan Rodgers doesn’t see Andy Carroll as part of his long-term plans, and unless he has some really quite drastic change of philosophy, then he has to be moved on. New managers arrive at clubs all the time and when they do, players who don’t fit into their conception of a team that will win football matches, are usually moved on. It doesn’t matter that it’s Andy Carroll, it doesn’t matter that he cost so much money and it doesn’t matter that Kenny Dalglish signed him either.

There is a school of thought that Brendan Rodgers is naïve in shifting Carroll without giving him a chance or looking at him in close quarters. Rodgers might learn the intricacies of Carroll’s game a bit better and there will be elements that may well surprise him.

But the bread and butter of Carroll’s game is there for the world to see. It’s not as if he is some shrinking violet with a hidden aspect of his game that has been restricted through playing out of position. Rodgers knows exactly what Carroll’s game is all about and if he doesn’t, it’s only going to be a stay of execution if he does.

This isn’t to say that there is any form of bad feeling around Carroll and not everybody wants to see the back of him. But if he was to stay, he needs to be backed to the hilt and have Rodgers craft his team around him. Rodgers has made the right noises about having Carroll in his team, but it’s difficult to tell whether the Northern Irishman is simply indulging in good PR. Luis Suarez will of course play a prominent part and the singing of Fabio Borini represents a tried and tested player for Rodgers. There’s no smoke without fire and if the club have indeed accepted a bid from West Ham then the gaffer must be happy to let him go. If that’s the case then Carroll is fighting a losing battle staying at Liverpool.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

When you cost your club so much money to acquire, the subsequent focus and expectation is unavoidable. Andy Carroll has become a victim of a transfer fee that he had no control over. One of the unfortunate sideshows has been the media’s continuous stirring of his situation and the added exposure certainly hasn’t done him any favours. It may seem like pedantic critique, but did a man as wily and experienced in the game as Kenny Dalglish not wonder what effect the title of most expensive British signing in history might have on Carroll? It’s academic now, but still food for thought.

But there is no more time for posturing and denial. Perhaps it’s time Rodgers made his intentions crystal clear. Because the current hesitation and indecision are only going to cost Liverpool and Andy Carroll dearly.

Carroll needs to play in a team that aren’t going to be afraid to back him all the way. Liverpool can’t pour any more time into something if their heart’s not truly in it.

Stick of twist with Andy Carroll? A simple question, but what would you do? Tell me how you see it all on Twitter, follow @samuel_antrobus and bat us your views. 

Tottenham V Liverpool Combined XI

Now this is the first time that we’ve tried one of these features for the site, but with the biggest game of a surprisingly busy Wednesday evening to look forward to at White Hart Lane between the two sides separated by just four points in the current Premier League standings, it’s an interesting one to explore and debate considering that the two squads are somewhat comparable in terms of the strength of their first XI.

Victory tonight could see Andre Villas-Boas’ side leap up into fifth while Liverpool boss Brendan Rodgers will be hoping to finally guide his team back into the top ten. The only criteria for selection is that injured players for this fixture are not eligible to play in the combined eleven, so that rules out Scott Parker (achilles), Younes Kaboul (knee) and Benoit Assou-Ekotto (knee) for the hosts and Lucas Leiva (thigh), Martin Kelly (knee) and Fabio Borini (foot) for the visitors. Lining up in a 4-2-3-1 formation that both teams have shown a penchant for this season, let’s get on with our starting eleven.

Click on Luis Suarez to see the full combined XI

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Blackpool Off To A Flyer In The Championship

“Don’t get carried away, don’t get carried away, don’t get carried away.”

That’s what most Blackpool fans are trying desperately to tell themselves after witnessing some of the best football they have seen by a Blackpool side.

And I don’t say that lightly.

Fans much older than myself came away from the Leeds game saying that is the best team they have ever seen. Even for much younger fans, who watched Vaughan, Adam and co. embarrass some Premier League sides, came away saying this football is better than that.

The most important thing is that this wasn’t one of those games where everything clicks and you give a side a right old pasting. Far from it. It looked like it would be ‘one of those days’ after two denied penalty claims, two strikes of the woodwork and countless missed chances.

But no, this was a game that we saw our new and improved philosophy and style of football come to fruition. The slick passing, the pressing, the movement, the creativity and the strength in depth. All this against a Neil Warnock side who pressed and harried, huffed and puffed and worked harder than a lot of teams will. And they never got near us.

Leeds will be up there at the end of the season, I don’t doubt that, they are a good team, but they left Bloomfield Road last night stunned and exhausted.

After a great start to the campaign against Millwall ending the first fixture looking down on the league, albeit only by virtue of alphabetical order, Blackpool looked to keep the ball rolling at home to a Leeds side that also tasted victory on the opening day.

All things considered it looked to be a great game. Two sides full of confidence, with some gifted players on show in front of a loud if not sell-out crowd. The only downside was some monsoon style rain earlier in the day that made the pitch very heavy, with 10 inch divots coming up with every turn. Thankfully, it had no bearing on the game, and we got a great spectacle. Two good sides playing out a fast-paced and entertaining match.

Right from the off there were chances, mainly for Blackpool as Leeds struggled to get a grip on our passing in the middle and pace out wide. But despite this, our long-term achilles heel of conceding from corners came back to haunt us. A soft goal all round, but before and after that goal, the game was almost entirely played out in only two thirds of the pitch. Only two dubious refereeing decisions and two great saves by Kenny stopped Blackpool ending the half with in the lead.

And in all honesty, that pattern continued after the break with Blackpool hitting the post after about a minute. A signal of intent and a sign of things to come. Three or four chances came our way within the first five minutes of the second half, all spurned. But something was coming. To be fair to Leeds, they had a 10 minute spell after about an hour, but aside from that it was waves of attack against them and in the end it was no surprise that they finally crumbled after two superbly crafted goals.

I can safely say it’s good to be back. It seems an age since our last game at Bloomfield Road, and after a night that saw such a great game, nobody can contain their excitement for Saturday.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

So that good result and fantastic performance makes for a very decent start to the season. Although it is only after two games, we sit top of the league, but most importantly we look on top form. With us still getting to grips with our mammoth squad, getting some of the late arrivals fitter and getting to know the system even better, surely things can only get better…

In truth, a successful next few weeks for us is not on the pitch, but off it in terms of keeping hold out our best players. Having looked safe over the summer, some are starting to worry now with offers and rumours coming in all over the place. If, come September, Phillips, Baptiste, Evatt and Ince are all walking out in tangerine, we can consider it the best possible start to the season. And if that is the case, I can’t see us finishing too far away from those top two spots.

But let’s try our best to not get carried away. Please…

[ad_pod id=’writer-1′ align=’right’]

Which Premier League club has the strongest strikeforce?

The Premier League last season was dominated by strikers, as the malaise on the overall standard of defenders continues. With Robin van Persie’s move to Manchester United from Arsenal perhaps tipping the balance of power back towards Ferguson’s side, it’s worth taking a look at the main contenders to see which club currently operating has the best strikeforce on show?

Firstly, let’s set some ground rules, otherwise we’ll resort simply to a ‘he’s better than him’ debate, which is all rather reductive and boring. This is in no way scientific, so feel free to chew the fat in the comment section below and I’m also discounting creative midfielders and wingers simply because they are not what you would term conventional strikers, so there’s no place for Hatem Ben Arfa, Juan Mata or Santi Cazorla I’m afraid, despite their obvious talent.

The criteria are – first-choice starters, back-up, variance to their attack, impact and pedigree. So without further ado, let’s get the ball rolling.

Manchester City are the first club that springs to mind, having won the league title last term and containing the likes of Sergio Aguero, Carlos Tevez, Mario Balotelli and Edin Dzeko within their squad. Aguero and Tevez are the first-choice pairing for the club and they’ve struck up a wonderful partnership in recent months, so we’ll give them 9/10 as they’re comparable to any in the rest of Europe.

When it comes to back-up, Mario Balotelli and Edin Dzeko are also formidable, with the Italian striking a double in the semi-final of Euro 2012 to knock Germany out, while Dzeko struck 14 times in the league last term despite not being first-choice, so we’ll give them 9/10 again. The variance is there, with Dzeko the big man, Aguero and Tevez the small, intricate forwards and Balotelli somewhere in between, so again, 9/10.

In terms of pedigree, Balotelli, Dzeko, Tevez and Aguero are all recognised players at international level and have experience of European competition – none have set either alight just yet, though, so 8/10 for that one. The impact of Tevez had transformed City as club laying the groundwork for future star players to follow, while Aguero’s record is exceptional despite only being in England a year – Balotelli and Dzeko have been somewhat more inconsistent, but they’ve scored goals in big games that helped them clinch the title last term, which at the end of the day, is what it’s all about, so we’ll mark them a brave and bold 10/10 for that – for those of you counting in the back, that’s an overall score of 45/50.

To Stamford Bridge next and the club’s three recognised strikers, one of which is out on loan, are Fernando Torres, Daniel Sturridge and Romelu Lukaku. The £50m Spaniard is the first-choice man in a 4-2-3-1 system, but a record of just 13 goals in 69 games, only seven of which have come in the league is quite frankly very poor, so 3/10 for him.

The back-up of Daniel Sturridge is decent, and this could all change soon, with the club reported to be chasing both Edinson Cavani and Hulk at the moment too, but there’s not much depth to speak of at the moment. The England international spent most of last term out wide on the right and despite an excellent first half of the campaign, faded badly, so we’ll give him a 5/10, given that Lukaku is out on loan at West Brom.

When it comes to variance, Sturridge is certainly different to Torres, relying on his pace more than positioning and sharply timed runs, so 6/10 for that, although it would be more if the big Belgian were still at the club. Impact at the club, having lost the hugely experienced Didier Drogba at the end of last season also comes in for a battering, with just 4/10. Pedigree is almost entirely weighted on to Torres, and despite his struggles, he’s a World Cup, Champions League and double European Championship winner, so in that regard, along with Sturridge, they get a 9/10 – a grand total of 27/50 for a club in a period of undoubted transition.

[divider]

Continued on Page TWO

[divider]

Newcastle can also stake a claim, with the likes of Demba Ba, Papiss Cisse and Shola Ameobi to choose from. With Ba pushed out onto the left flank to accommodate Hatem Ben Arfa as much as Cisse, they do play with two strikers, but one in a less conventional position, but they retain that threat, so first-choice we’ll plump for 8/10, but back-up, with only Shola and his younger brother Sammy Ameobi at the minute in supporting roles brings it in at just 4/10.

Variance is another poor one, for all four players are largely similar, with Cisse and Ba capable of playing it on the deck and in the air, while the Ameobi brothers are the same and they all largely rely on a powerful, somewhat physical approach, so 5/10 for that one. The two Senegalese players impact, though, cannot be underestimated, with Ba carrying the side in the first half of last season, Cisse in the second on their goals alone and they wouldn’t have finished fifth without either one of them playing their part, so 10/10 for that.

Their pedigree, while they’ve scored goals wherever they’ve been so far in their careers, they’ve only just started out at international level and boast little to no European experience at all, so 5/10 with room for improvement there – grand total of 32/50 edging just ahead of Chelsea.

Swiftly moving on to Manchester United, the main rivals for City and in terms of first-choice starters, considering they have the two top goalscorers in the league last season up front in Wayne Rooney and Robin van Persie, we’ll mark that down as a solid 10/10, with 57 league goals between them last term.

The club also boats enviable back-up, with Dimitar Berbatov fifth-choice and searching for a lifeboat out of the club behind Danny Welbeck and Javier Hernandez, so again 10/10, with no side in Europe aside from perhaps Real Madrid and Barcelona having as much firepower in reserve.

When it comes to variance too, with Rooney and Van Perise capable of playing multiple roles out wide or through the centre, and possessing the ability to create chances and drop deeper, Welbeck’s pace, Hernandez’s poacher style and Berbatov’s languid elegance see them achieve another great mark of 10/10.

Pedigree is again a strong suit, with 133 goals at international level between them and a further 95 in Europe, which when you compare it to City’s 53 at international level and 50 in Europe is on an entirely different level, and even when you take out Berbatov’s tally, should he seal a likely departure, they’re still ahead on both counts, so in keeping with City’s mark, they get 9/10.

Impact is the final and worst category for the club, with Welbeck still in the first stages of his blossoming career and boasting massive potential, Hernandez looks somewhat injury-prone after an excellent first year at Old Trafford and Berbatov something of a flat-track bully, while Van Perise has only just arrived, leaving Rooney to carry the burden here for a generous 7/10 – this leaves them with a grand total of (drum roll please) 46 out of 50 to move into the lead.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Liverpool don’t really even have an attack worth looking at, with only Luis Suarez to speak of, with Fabio Borini new and Andy Carroll ineffective, while Tottenham have only just signed Emmanuel Adebayor to help out Jermain Defoe, so they won’t even come close, with their threat coming out wide from the likes of Gareth Bale and Aaron Lennon and through the middle in Gylfi Sigurdsson and Rafael van der Vaart, with both clubs predominantly opting for one up top, so they don’t particularly factor into this debate, despite being top eight sides.

The final club on offer is Arsenal, and having just lost Robin van Persie, they could be directly hindered here, with their first-choice duo of new signings Olivier Giroud and Lukas Podolski both in their first respective seasons in the top flight and it remains to be seen how Wenger will play them in the same side, with the pressure on them to settle straight away absolutely huge now, so we’ll give them a cautious 6/10.

Moving on to the back-up players and the likes of Marouane Chamakh, Nicklas Bendtner and Park Chu-Young are all bracketed under the term ‘deadwood’ and while the Dane may still have something to offer, the cupboard’s pretty bare, so 4/10 for that. Variance is again a troubling one, with most of the striking options fairly slow and cumbersome players, relying on the pace and trickery of wide players to help them out, so 5/10 here. Impact is a difficult one to quantify, as both the main men are new to the club, so without trying to sound too unfair, they only way forward here is to assign them a middle of the road 5/10.

Pedigree is the final category and Podolski boasts an exemplary one at international level, with 44 goals and 101 caps for Germany, even if his club career isn’t quite up to the same standard, but Giroud is a relative infant with just one goal and 10 caps. The back-up comes to the rescue here, though, with Bendtner, Chamakh and Park amassing 60 international goals between them, adding to large total of 282 international caps across the entire strikeforce, but a lack of top-level European football holds them back to just 7/10 – this leaves the grand total for Arsenal at 27 out of 50.

So there you have it, using my somewhat bonkers and completely non-scientific scoring system, the top five strikeforces in the Premier League are as follows – Manchester United (46/50), Manchester City (45/50), Newcastle (32/50), and Chelsea (27/50) and Arsenal tied (27/50), with Liverpool and Tottenham bringing up the rear due to a lack of discernible depth. Sir Alex Ferguson’s purchase of Dutchman Robin van Persie this summer has tipped the scales in United’s favour and they now have the strongest set of strikers in the entire top flight.

Do you agree with the scores attributed to each club? Any that you think I’ve been overly harsh or lax with? You know the drill by now, post them in the comment section below.

You can follow me on Twitter @JamesMcManus1

Game
Register
Service
Bonus